- Mar 3, 2017
- 1,687
- 6,243
- 136
Its 35W ES of 4 Zen5+8 Zen5C with 16 CU design.And this 8950HS with 130/2400 pts is supposedly what? Strix Halo?
For comparison:
CB 2024
Ryzen 9 7950X -> 125/2185 pts
Not much better in ST If true.
I mean yea, Turin is a thing.IF this is true its running circles around Zen 4 in terms of perf/watt.
STX1 should be clocked roughly the same as PHX1 so it's a nice comparison point.Please don't forget that for Zen5 quite likely applies a similar difference in peak frequency, as for Zen4 Desktop vs. Mobile.
I feel like he’s just guessing anyway, wouldn’t read too much into it yet.Damn you are quick. Anyway 7950x official score is 2919 from here: https://browser.geekbench.com/processors/amd-ryzen-9-7950x
The 8950X late ES got 3500 roughly, so about 20% ST uplift. Very disappointing to me to be honest.
Keep in mind that early BIOS releases after a major µArch change tend to need time to settle before you can really judge the performance as fully accurate to the HW potential.The 8950X late ES got 3500 roughly, so about 20% ST uplift. Very disappointing to me to be honest.
If it truly hits 3500 ST in GB6 that’s a good result IMO. If it improves on that I’d be pretty bullish for the release.Keep in mind that early BIOS releases after a major µArch change tend to need time to settle before you can really judge the performance as fully accurate to the HW potential.
True to a point, but without core clock context for comparison it doesn't mean much.Its 35W ES of 4 Zen5+8 Zen5C with 16 CU design.
35W ES, supposedly.
IF this is true its running circles around Zen 4 in terms of perf/watt.
Versus 7940H it's exactly 32% faster in GB6 ST test (7940H scores 2616pts @ 5.2Ghz). If adroc is correct and ST max boost is similar to Zen 4 mobile parts (~5.2Ghz), we have a nice confirmation of IPC over 30% in some tests.If it truly hits 3500 ST in GB6 that’s a good result IMO. If it improves on that I’d be pretty bullish for the release.
What do you mean? UserBenchmark will declare Intel the one and only winner of CPU comparison. Regardless of reviews, and scores.What tickles my funny bone is the lengths Intel will go, to prevent Zen 5 ending 2024 as the undisputed x86 GB6 ST champ
(without exotic cooling)
Seriously?Its 35W ES of 4 Zen5+8 Zen5C with 16 CU design.
35W ES, supposedly.
IF this is true its running circles around Zen 4 in terms of perf/watt.
It must be that Mahogany Crankshaft, or something.Seriously?
4*Zen5+8*Zen5c 8950HS(>>35W) ES: 130/2400 pts
12*Zen4 R9 7900(65/88W): 107/1419 pts
Result: 21.5% better ST and 69% better MT.
I can still accept ST gain, but that MT is impossible considering It has the same amount of cores.
Let's see MTL beat Raptor Lake and Zen 4 mobile parts in performance. That's a tall order as it is, no need to bring in Zen 5 juggernaut to the fight.So I think Meteor Lake is going to beat AMD Strix and M3!
Then I woke up...
That would still be ridiculously good for something with only 12 cores.Could be 2400 pts at something like 80-100W, the 7950X use about 160W in CB 2024.
Halo was never monolithic. Strix halo is not coming to desktop ever, unless AMD caves in to the demand of all 10 people who'd actually pay premium price for this chip on AM5.
There's plenty market for APUs in embedded SFF desktops a la NUCs, just not socketed systems.Laptops. Duhhhhhh.
AMD doesn't see a market for APUs. Hence no monolithic APU on AM5 yet.
Current LPDDR5 specs are getting better at 9600 MT/s even without the full benefit of full fat DDR5 latencies.I don't think it is possible to release Strix Halo to Socket AM5.
First, if it just uses external DDR5 memory, it loses half of the bandwidth, meaning roughly half of the graphics performance.
Second, Socket AM5 is too small to house a chip with internal 4x LPDDR5 memory chips.
Except in the vid that table says 2K and not 2400 for 8950HS (35W). 2400 is supposed 8950x.To be honest with you guys.
I would NOT be surprised if that 2400 MT Cinebench 2024 score was actually 1400 for those ESes .
And somebody simply made a typo.
Then how do you explain 7950x w/ 2919 vs 8950x w/ 3500 ?Versus 7940H it's exactly 32% faster in GB6 ST test (7940H scores 2616pts @ 5.2Ghz). If adroc is correct and ST max boost is similar to Zen 4 mobile parts (~5.2Ghz), we have a nice confirmation of IPC over 30% in some tests.
I mean, you would expect 12 full cores to provide 3/4 of that performance.