- Mar 3, 2017
- 1,687
- 6,243
- 136
Sounds ominous, actually.There is no desktop Zen6, it's just client.
Kinda the opposite, DT won't be stuck with unfitting uncore anymore.Sounds ominous, actually.
EhhKinda the opposite, DT won't be stuck with unfitting uncore anymore.
Desktop is also luggables, ergo mobile, ergo relevant.desktop just gets shuffled further back on the priority list.
It's a good fit.In theory desktop could benefit from sharing a design with mobile
Seems like MLID does not have much info on Zen 6 client so far...There is no desktop Zen6, it's just client.
Server parts live on their own and there should be major differences between mainstream (SP8) and halo (SP7) platforms.
I think the IO die would be an overkill for mainstream desktop.Damn it, I think I know why there is no Zen7 in the roadmap. Cause 32-core Venice CCD made by N2 process will become Zen7 which will be unveiled in 2027. By that time, DDR6 is readily available, AMD only need to redesign new IOD with 128-bit DDR6 memory bus then voila we have new platform for AM6..
man i'd kill for a new chipset with boards that weren't all the same gray/black meh color scheme.
…what I for one understood from this thread so far…
I spoke just for myself. :-)I’ve not followed all posts in this thread in detail, but cannot recall that such a definitive conclusion has been made.
Correct, apart from AMD claiming that Zen 5 was a "new grounds-up microarchitecture" with "re-pipelined front end and wide issue". And AMD spoke of Zen 5 products to be made on 4nm and 3nm class manufacturing nodes (and further, that there shall be Zen 5/ Zen 5c/ Zen 5 V-cache products not entirely unlike the current product split).Regardless, isn’t all the discussion in this thread just speculation anyway? I’ve not seen any official info from AMD mentioning what you described.
I think that Zen 5, being a more efficient arch in terms of IPC, will get hotter than Zen 4 because it will be less busy between pipeline stalls and loading data from caches/RAM. That, to me, explains the rumored lower maximum frequencies. So while Zen 5 may be able to consume more power and scale to higher performance, it won't be able to do so without exotic cooling.Am I talking nonsense, or am I merely channeling Captain Obvious here?
Absolutely not.It seems like the dense 32 core die is now the mainstream version
Nah, i am buying desktop, cause i dont need mobility. And i expect significantly more performance in return. Currently, the mobile 7945hx provides like 90 percent of performance of desktop 7950x, both in ST and MT. As if that was already meh not enough, conflating desktop and mobile into client or whatever you call it, takes this another step further. If i specifically did not need those top Nvidia gpus for gpu rendering, i might as well buy laptop as my next rig.Desktop is also luggables, ergo mobile, ergo relevant.
It's a good fit.
You also don't need server uncore so with Zen6 you're getting a more appropriate solution.Nah, i am buying desktop, cause i dont need mobilit
Uncore is the IOD die?You also don't need server uncore so with Zen6 you're getting a more appropriate solution.
You're welcome.
So with Zen 6, we will finally have a dedicated client solution and not rejected server silicon?You also don't need server uncore so with Zen6 you're getting a more appropriate solution.
Along with fabric topology and d2d link choices.Uncore is the IOD die?
Well yeah.So with Zen 6, we will finally have a dedicated client solution and not rejected server silicon?
What will be the fate of the rejected server silicon once Zen 6 ships?Well yeah.
I'm curious to see this. As I've been building DT DIY systems for 25 years, it, uh, feels weird. But, if it performs well, IDC.Ehh
In theory desktop could benefit from sharing a design with mobile. In practice, desktop just gets shuffled further back on the priority list.
Benefit how? Desktop will get gimped if it's based on mobile silicon. It would become the same thing as an HX series gamer/workstation CPU.In theory desktop could benefit from sharing a design with mobile.
Desktop is already gimped from being server table scraps. It should really just be Epyc & Threadripper using those dies. They could create 2 dies for all of mobile and desktop, 8C & 16C Phoenix.Benefit how? Desktop will get gimped if it's based on mobile silicon. It would become the same thing as an HX series gamer/workstation CPU.
Death.What will be the fate of the rejected server silicon once Zen 6 ships?
The only difference between that and DT is power target.It would become the same thing as an HX series gamer/workstation CPU.
Nothing changes besides fabric power.A monolithic AMD processor on N4P