No the recent AMD-blocks-DLSS FUD.
Yeah most people who want 24C+ probably have money for a TR.But there is threadripper for mainstream "moar cores" and then server .
But I can get Genoa cheaper than threadripper on ebay.... Building my 5th Genoa box right now.No the recent AMD-blocks-DLSS FUD.
AMD utterly failed to control the narrative and he's like the head honcho whose job is to do just that.
Yeah most people who want 24C+ probably have money for a TR.
Cries in destitute 😭Yeah most people who want 24C+ probably have money for a TR.
I just happen to think, that after 3 generations topping at 16 cores and soon another one to be added, it would be nice if from Zen6 on, the desktop ceiling got increased to 24C and TR then started at 32. Especially, since the server core count gets increased by each passing gen, from 64 to 96 and probably 128 or whatever number in the future.I hate to agree since I am always wanting more cores. But there is threadripper for mainstream "moar cores" and then server .
But I can get Genoa cheaper than threadripper on ebay.... Building my 5th Genoa box right now.
There’s nothing to gain going past 16C without an expansion of memory channels and PCIe lanes. The consumer doesn’t even buy many 16C processors, the best selling SKUs are still 8C.I just happen to think, that after 3 generations topping at 16 cores and soon another one to be added, it would be nice if from Zen6 on, the desktop ceiling got increased to 24C and TR then started at 32. Especially, since the server core count gets increased by each passing gen, from 64 to 96 and probably 128 or whatever number in the future.
Here is my first one. From a reputable dealer. Used retail. $4,840Let me guess. they got it "off the back of a truck", eh?
You mean 8 Zen5 + 32 Zen5C or the Intel version?I'd rather have large big.LITTLE combo, in terms of core counts, even something as stupid as 8+32, rather than just plain 16-24 performance cores.
How do you think Jack Huynh will do?No the recent AMD-blocks-DLSS FUD.
AMD utterly failed to control the narrative and he's like the head honcho whose job is to do just that.
Intel's go you covered.I'd rather have large big.LITTLE combo, in terms of core counts, even something as stupid as 8+32, rather than just plain 16-24 performance cores.
Why do you love Cinebench so much?I'd rather have large big.LITTLE combo, in terms of core counts, even something as stupid as 8+32, rather than just plain 16-24 performance cores.
I just happen to think, that after 3 generations topping at 16 cores and soon another one to be added, it would be nice if from Zen6 on, the desktop ceiling got increased to 24C and TR then started at 32. Especially, since the server core count gets increased by each passing gen, from 64 to 96 and probably 128 or whatever number in the future.
I just happen to think, that after 3 generations topping at 16 cores and soon another one to be added, it would be nice if from Zen6 on, the desktop ceiling got increased to 24C and TR then started at 32. Especially, since the server core count gets increased by each passing gen, from 64 to 96 and probably 128 or whatever number in the future.
Forgot to add those sales charts from DIY market in Germany:
PS: I made a prediction that 7800x3d will cause the socket AM5 to exceed AM6 by end of June. Well, I was 1/4 right. It is the 7800x3d that caused the AM5 to finally outsell AM4, but it happened 5 months later, at the end of November.
Funny, I think I would prefer something like the opposite of 8+32, or said in another way, I think I would prefer something closer to what Apple does for their Mac SOCs: a handful of efficiency cores with the bulk of the CPU as big cores, like a 12+4. If I truly had an embarrassingly parallel workload, I think I'd want either a GPU to do the work or at least equal performance on a per-core basis.I'd rather have large big.LITTLE combo, in terms of core counts, even something as stupid as 8+32, rather than just plain 16-24 performance cores.
This could also fit the bill.Funny, I think I would prefer something like the opposite of 8+32, or said in another way, I think I would prefer something closer to what Apple does for their Mac SOCs: a handful of efficiency cores with the bulk of the CPU as big cores, like a 12+4. If I truly had an embarrassingly parallel workload, I think I'd want either a GPU to do the work or at least equal performance on a per-core basis.
For me? Even 4Z5+8Z5C wouls be enough, if it would provide power efficiency.You mean 8 Zen5 + 32 Zen5C or the Intel version?
If It's the first, I can understand that, but If It's the latter, then doesn't make sense. It would perform like 24 performance cores and at some threads count you will even lose performance.
Dense aren't efficient, they're cheap.if it would provide power efficiency.
"Locked to Dell."AMD EPYC 9654 Server Processor (3.7 GHz, 96 Cores, Socket SP5) Tray - 100-000000789 for sale online | eBay
Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for AMD EPYC 9654 Server Processor (3.7 GHz, 96 Cores, Socket SP5) Tray - 100-000000789 at the best online prices at eBay! Free shipping for many products!www.ebay.com
That's great for you. Maybe not all of the 4 chips offered were locked to Dell and you were lucky to get one that isn't. Or the seller included this line just to be on the safe side just in case but didn't have the capacity to verify it themselves.Whats odd, it says I bought it, so I know its the right post, but mine is on a supermicro motherboard !
2 read 1 write and they do some write coalescing/compression on GMI3 anyway.
You're still gonna be limited by whatever the SDP count on the fabric side of things.
Ehhh negligible difference.
Mainstream is going to struggle with memory bandwidth as core counts go higher, which is probably one of the reasons why we'll be stuck at 16C on AMD platforms for awhile. The costs associated with building motherboards for quad channel (or more!) would irritate OEMs. Never mind that mainstream boards can easily hit $1k now . . .I hate to agree since I am always wanting more cores. But there is threadripper for mainstream "moar cores" and then server .