- Mar 3, 2017
- 1,687
- 6,235
- 136
Sort of. 3.5 actually works.
Yeah, but clocks is where RDNA3 struggled.It supposedly has better voltage-clock curves, which is why they're putting an additional 2 WGPs in there without increasing power consumption, but IPC-per-WGP should be similar between the two.
Phoenix wasn't bandwidth-bound much, and neither was RMB.Of course, Strix Point's GPU should be even more bandwidth bottlenecked than Phoenix's because there's 33% more WGPs
CPU: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 170
Min/Max/Avg: 3545/3673/3653 MHz
Codename: Strix Point
Single: 2544
Multi: 14158
https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/6418984
This is extremely disappointing
my GB 6.3 results on 7840HS (same as 8845HS)
YIKES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They rebranded it last minute and it's either running the silent mode or it's clock-locked using the PBO available on pre-prod BIOSes.But the model name, clock rates and/or clock rate reporting don't seem to be correct for that Strix example.
They rebranded it last minute and it's either running the silent mode or it's clock-locked using the PBO available on pre-prod BIOSes.
This is extremely disappointing
my GB 6.3 results on 7840HS (same as 8845HS)
single 2396
multi 12477
and that's with 3 browsers open, 50 tabs active and another 600 inactive, several apps open and music playing in backgroundLENOVO 82Y4 - Geekbench
Benchmark results for a LENOVO 82Y4 with an AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS processor.browser.geekbench.com
YIKES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dont post much, but wow, shock horror, what a revelation this isAMD, it turns out, likes to make money just as much as Intel and Nvidia.
i hope this is true only to see the reaction on that eeediot website, what was it called again, oh yeah userbenchmark ...Zen5 @ 5.7ghz = ~3950points according to that scaling
Almost seem too good to be true 👍
Zen5 @ 5.7ghz = ~3950points according to that scaling
Almost seem too good to be true 👍
are you saying the strix point GB bench is fake?
also the theory that "linear 5.1 will be 3500+" is plain wrong
just did 7840hs gb6.3 @ base freq with boost disabled
1975 single
10848 multi
~20% difference
which means at very best case strix point at max boost (?) has around 2800 single 15000 multi
Bingo.Comparing your base freq. run to the STX point result, the STX CPU has a 29% higher score while running at a ~4% slower frequency. Not sure why you think that is extremely disappointing. If it ran at 5.1 GHz, it should score at least 3350 pts, if not higher
I was about to reply to that post but you beat me to it again. The scores are looking good so far, but we need to wait for granite ridge leaks to be sure.GB says your higher run was run at between 4.6 - 4.7 GHz. So from base, that is approximately a 22% increase in frequency for 21% more performance, pretty close to linear.
Edit: Comparing your base freq. run to the STX point result, the STX CPU has a 29% higher score while running at a ~4% slower frequency. Not sure why you think that is extremely disappointing. If it ran at 5.1 GHz, it should score at least 3350 pts, if not higher (3554 would be perfect scaling but it won't quite get that).
Well nothing is certain at this point. Same goes for Lion cove copium/hopium that it can get noticeably faster in Arrow LakeSo it’s official AT canon that Strix does 3300+ GB6? So we’re going to have the hype train derail twice?
Go be annoying elsewhere.So it’s official AT canon that Strix does 3300+ GB6? So we’re going to have the hype train derail twice?
Go be annoying elsewhere.
The official canon is Phoenix times 1.16 until proven otherwise.
I was trained by Jack HandeyDont post much, but wow, shock horror, what a revelation this is
Intel said it could. It’s not hopium except to hope Intel stopped redacted.Well nothing is certain at this point. Same goes for Lion cove copium/hopium that it can get noticeably faster in Arrow Lake
It could be anything but they gave us a score comparison to SDXE (with inaccurate footnotes lol) that suggests it is closer to 1.16x in GB6 too.Could be 1.4 in GB. It's still going to be ~1.16 across a range of tasks.