They possibly use the CPUID library to read clocks. I think the developer is too cheap for the latest licenseit seems GB may need a revise or update the algorithm for these new hardware.
You need to pose this question here: http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=thread...tsmc-samsung-foundry-intel-2020-2025.2579857/intel keeps being unable to create high perf/watt chips in their new nodes
it's either 20watt ULV in new nodes or 300watt monsters in old nodes, consistent pattern
this is reflected in meteor lake regression as well
can someone explain this pattern in real terms
Interesting, this Minisforum AtomMan G7 MiniPC that will be released on July 10th will give an early glimps of the Strix Halo gaming performance:
It has a 7945HX (16 core Dragon Range CPU) + a 32CU 7600M XT in a rather spacious form-factor.
Strix Halo should offer better performance with its 40 RDNA 3.5 CUs and Zen 5, but it will probably be cooling limited in thin and light laptops.
The effective bandwidth of the two GPUs should be very similar (256 GB/s with LPDDRX-8000 vs 288 GB/s for 7600M XT). The MALL / L3 is the same size (but Strix needs to share stuff with the CPU). And while Strix has 25% more CUs (possibliy also clocked higher based on Strix Point's 2.9 Ghz) I don't think it will outpace the 7600M by more than 20-30% at most.
It won't be the same but the ballpark will be similar.
So what's the consensus here, is zen 5 good yet?
Or the world's first personal quantum mechanical computer!As soon as I can figure out a way to isolate these polar extremes and attach them to a bar, I think I'll be able to build an engine capable of powering a small country.
Exactly, and unless you enjoy walled gardens it is a horrible eco system.
Percentages are hard.He mangle my name to igor_kavinsky
I WILL SUE!
Maybe his mind went, Eyegore KavinSKY!
He also didn't bother to read the rest of the thread before posting this crap table:
View attachment 101933
That score has nothing to do with the percentages!
At least WTFtech didn't invent stuff.
Oh well. Now I get to read their reader comments too.
He mangle my name to igor_kavinsky
I WILL SUE!
Maybe his mind went, Eyegore KavinSKY!
He also didn't bother to read the rest of the thread before posting this crap table:
View attachment 101933
That score has nothing to do with the percentages!
At least WTFtech didn't invent stuff.
Oh well. Now I get to read their reader comments too.
I've had the pleasure of trying to fix a borked Mac without access to the app store, where I wasn't even able to install any form of MacOS. That was not a pleasant experience. It was an old intel Mac so the only way to get it running was to install windows 10.I wasn't aware that my M1 MBP can't run whatever I might want to install or compile from source. Maybe you're referring to their iOS devices. If you've ever had to do tech support for your technology illiterate family you want them in a walled garden unless you don't value your time.
Maybe someone using a phone tablet as a sole device would feel differently, but I can't think of any instance where Apple's walled garden has made my iPad/iPhone experience worse. In reality it doesn't exist for anyone technical enough to need the ability to install their own programs as you can get a developer account and install whatever you want on your own device. I suppose you could argue that precludes being able to run arbitrary closed source binaries, but that's its own form of walled garden.
Frankly I wish there was a nice PC/Android walled garden option available as some people neither need nor should have the absolute freedom typically afforded by those platforms. Or are you the sort that doesn't believe in putting your kid in a play pen? Little Timmy should have the freedom to crawl out onto the street. People focus too much on the walls in the metaphor and ignore the garden, a pleasant place to be and to be kept apart from outside invaders. There are things with walls that don't enclose a garden, so unless you consider iOS a prison you should ease up on the banal and off-topic moralizing.
Hinges get rusty! Better to get rid of them!This igor_kavinski person seems a bit unhinged.
It is Tom's, what did you expect ?He mangle my name to igor_kavinsky
I WILL SUE!
Maybe his mind went, Eyegore KavinSKY!
He also didn't bother to read the rest of the thread before posting this crap table:
View attachment 101933
That score has nothing to do with the percentages!
At least WTFtech didn't invent stuff.
Oh well. Now I get to read their reader comments too.
Such heresy shall not be tolerated!He mangle my name to igor_kavinsky
I WILL SUE!
Maybe his mind went, Eyegore KavinSKY!
He also didn't bother to read the rest of the thread before posting this crap table:
View attachment 101933
That score has nothing to do with the percentages!
At least WTFtech didn't invent stuff.
Oh well. Now I get to read their reader comments too.
Well now it's personal!It is Tom's, what did you expect ?
I wasn't aware that my M1 MBP can't run whatever I might want to install or compile from source. Maybe you're referring to their iOS devices.
I can't imagine any reason for them to do that. It won't provide a meaningful uplift in Gaming (probably nothing at all). Only thing I could imagine is that 88W PPT 9700X looks a bit dull next to 142 PPT 7700X in heavy multithreading, so they are using brute force now.Looks like AMD is considering changes to Zen 5 TDP figures. Changing 9700X from 65W -> 120W TDP.
The reason mentioned in the article was that it looks bad that the new Zen5 9700X is slower in gaming than the old Zen4 7800X3D.I can't imagine any reason for them to do that.
Zen is never TDP limited in gaming. This is most likely to make it more competitive in MT vs 6+8 ARL.The reason mentioned in the article was that it looks bad that the new Zen5 9700X is slower in gaming than the old Zen4 7800X3D.
Skymont is better than what AMD expected I can only assume.Zen is never TDP limited in gaming. This is most likely to make it more competitive in MT vs 6+8 ARL.
How about AMD doesn't care?Skymont is better than what AMD expected I can only assume.