- Mar 3, 2017
- 1,729
- 6,486
- 136
I am sorry but the 9700x only consumes up to 88 watts. If the 14900k needs >150 watts to beat the 9700x I don’t consider that a win.At Computex they claimed ZEN5 trashes 14900K. If these Numbers are right, 14900K will be slightly faster instead
There's literally 200MHz separating thoseComputex slide was for the 9950X, the current slide is for a 9700X.
Really? We had 3 Gens of Chiplet Ryzens now and you still don't know how they work? There is no benefit of that extra Cache. Every Gen the difference between 8 Core and 16 Core in Gaming was negligible200MHz and 32MB.
Zen 3 has the same problem- go above JEDEC and IOD gobbles power. You'd probably notice a pretty good uplift.I guess my paltry scores at very low power vs Zen 4 and Zen 5 have a lot to do with my 12nm IOD vs the 6nm. I didnt bother with going JDEC speeds, I dont think the power addition would have done much.
That AI thumbnail is hideous, I didn't click on the video when it was on my reccomended page (because I'm getting AI-generated slop in reccomendations sometimes), but only now I understand that it was Ian's video...
Zen Daddy LMAO
According to Computerbase the 13900K/14900K are 14/16% faster than the 5800X3D at 720p, you think that this advantage increase at 1080p.?.Really? We had 3 Gens of Chiplet Ryzens now and you still don't know how they work? There is no benefit of that extra Cache. Every Gen the difference between 8 Core and 16 Core in Gaming was negligible
AMD marketing momentAt Computex they claimed ZEN5 trashes 14900K. If these Numbers are right, 14900K will be slightly faster instead
Techpowerup has the 13900k being 15% faster than the 5800x3d at 1080p.According to Computerbase the 13900K/14900K are 14/16% faster than the 5800X3D at 720p, you think that this advantage increase at 1080p.?.
Or that it will rather decrease to something like 10%.?.
In wich case 12% faster than the 5800X3D would be slightl faster than these Intel chips, btw i added the 13900K in the comparison because it s set at 253W while the 14900K is at unlimited power in their benches.
Intel Core i9-14900KS im Test: Benchmarks in Spielen vs. AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D und Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Intel Core i9-14900KS im Test: Benchmarks in Spielen vs. AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D und Ryzen 7 7800X3D / Testsystem und Testmethodik für Spielewww.computerbase.de
The "FP slide" doesn't even have an asterisk mentioning the <512b SIMDs. AMD marketing...Was there any mention that Strix-Point has narrower SIMD units vs GraniteRidge? I took a brief look at the slides, but nothing there. Would be grateful if someone could point them out. Also if I remember correctly David Huang did not measure 2 cycle FADD latency...
16% IPC? So much for the "like-zen4-sandbagging" theory.AnandTech Zen 5 overview dropped: https://www.anandtech.com/show/2146...bile-strix-point-with-rdna-35-igpu-xdna-2-npu
Massive FP register file. The FP side as a whole is hella chonky.AnandTech Zen 5 overview dropped: https://www.anandtech.com/show/2146...bile-strix-point-with-rdna-35-igpu-xdna-2-npu
We already know the score for 9950X, 5ghz all core = 43K~
The new theory is that Turin is going to bring an extra 12% IPC increase over client 🤣16% IPC? So much for the "like-zen4-sandbagging" theory.
There s dedicated slides for the comparison, think what you want.AMD marketing moment
Techpowerup has the 13900k being 15% faster than the 5800x3d at 1080p.
Either way, doesn't look like Zen 5 will be much, if at all, faster than RPL.
Same repeat with zen 4 being marginally faster than 5800x3d?There s dedicated slides for the comparison, think what you want.
Ryzen 9000/AI 300: Details zu Zen 5, RDNA 3.5, Zen 6(c) & Zen 7
Ryzen 9000 kommt am 31. Juli. Schon heute gibt es weitere technische Details zu den Desktop-CPUs und Ryzen AI 300 Strix Point für Notebooks.www.computerbase.de