AT isn't a hobby???
I'm dealing with a really bad cold at the moment.So I am not the only one who's baffled. It seems Igor has turned into a different person starting this month!
On single-thread? No it wouldn't. SPECint is barely sensitive to DRAM bandwidth at all. Essentially no single-threaded load that isn't a vector microbenchmark is going to saturate a modern CPU's memory bandwidth.
This is crap you just hallucinated.
I'm pretty happy. Just get annoyed when I see comparisons between Mx and Zen. Apple can get invited to the party when they develop their Prism emulator to run Win32 software.Not one that seems to make you happy, at any rate. Doesn't make me happy either. But, old habits.
I'm pretty happy. Just get annoyed when I see comparisons between Mx and Zen. Apple can get invited to the party when they develop their Prism emulator to run Win32 software.
Apple's huge caches are masking that latency hit. Don't think DDR5 DIMMs would help, even 12 channels of them.SPECint is, however, sensitive to memory latency. Something you sacrifice using LPDDR5 versus DDR5.
At Core i5 speeds.Win/ARM runs fine on ARM Macs in virtualization.
At Core i5 speeds.
Link?Win/ARM runs at M-whatever speeds. It's native code.
Link?
Link?
Sure, you just turn the knob and that's it. Look how it made Intel look like...I like how you answered your own question. Let me help: M4 can be pushed further. Apple chose not to, to keep it within the efficient part of the v/f curve.
Zen5 can't solve all the worlds problems too, I wish it did.
But since you ask so nicely...
MacBook Pro M3 Max (Parallels, ARM64, 12 cores, 25992) - Geekbench
Benchmark results for a Parallels International GmbH. Parallels ARM Virtual Machine with an Apple Silicon processor.browser.geekbench.com
Note that the MT score here is for only 12 cores, not the full 14-16; it is unclear which ones are passed through to the guest.
Yes, the M3 Pro tested by NBC scores lower than the higher-end model, the M3 Max. Big news. M3 Pro has TWICE as few performance cores.MT score is worthless in GB6, beside the 12 cores device tested by NBC score about 10% lower than what you posted.
Not that NBC are 100% accurate but that s a more reliable number than a GB6 submission whose conditions are unknown.
Apple M4 SoC analysis - AMD, Intel and Qualcomm currently don't stand a chance
Notebookcheck has tested the new Apple M4 processor within the iPad Pro 11 as well as the iPad Pro 13.www.notebookcheck.net
Yes, the M3 Pro tested by NBC scores lower than the higher-end model, the M3 Max. Big news.
You are comparing a tablet running iOS against a Mac running Windows virtualized on MacOS. What is this supposed to show?MT score is worthless in GB6, beside the 12 cores device tested by NBC score about 10% lower than what you posted.
Not that NBC are 100% accurate but that s a more reliable number than a GB6 submission whose conditions are unknown.
Apple M4 SoC analysis - AMD, Intel and Qualcomm currently don't stand a chance
Notebookcheck has tested the new Apple M4 processor within the iPad Pro 11 as well as the iPad Pro 13.www.notebookcheck.net
MT score is worthless in GB6, beside the 12 cores device tested by NBC score about 10% lower than what you posted.
Not that NBC are 100% accurate but that s a more reliable number than a GB6 submission whose conditions are unknown.
Apple M4 SoC analysis - AMD, Intel and Qualcomm currently don't stand a chance
Notebookcheck has tested the new Apple M4 processor within the iPad Pro 11 as well as the iPad Pro 13.www.notebookcheck.net
You are comparing a tablet running iOS against a Mac running Windows virtualized on MacOS. What is this supposed to show?
Someone should tell people that their Windows install is likely running virtualized on top of a type-1 hypervisor. At least it does out-of-the-box IIRC.Congratulations! As is your tradition, you have completely missed the point!
(Igor was saying that virtualized Win/ARM has "i5 performance.")
It happen that the virtualised Windows submitted at GB yield a higher score than MacOS since that s what NBC is using, so what is your point.?.
Reread my post carefully with your finger to be sure you got all the words. See? Laptop vs tablet? Windows on MacOS vs iOS? You don't see the stupidity of the comparison?It happen that the virtualised Windows yield a higher score than MacOS since that s what NBC is using, so what is your point.?.
It happen that the virtualised Windows submitted at GB yield a higher score than MacOS since that s what NBC is using, so what is your point.?.
Does this make a difference in GB, on average.?.Reread my post carefully with your finger to be sure you got all the words. See? Laptop vs tablet? Windows on MacOS vs iOS? You don't see the stupidity of the comparison?
What specific numbers are you talking about?