Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)

Page 178 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Glo.

Diamond Member
Apr 25, 2015
5,761
4,666
136
Since AMD creates the SOC for both Playstation and Xbox, they could probably do something similar for PC if there were a marketing for it (which I doubt)
From engineering standing point of view - companies can do whatever they want.

The problem is - the market. Its customers and what they want to pay money for, or rather - are used to pay money for.
 
Reactions: TESKATLIPOKA

soresu

Platinum Member
Dec 19, 2014
2,955
2,173
136
From engineering standing point of view - companies can do whatever they want.

The problem is - the market. Its customers and what they want to pay money for, or rather - are used to pay money for.
I'd hoped that Valve might test those waters for AMD by ordering a semi custom console scale chip to follow Steam Deck's Van Gogh.

Now that Steam OS is proving the viability of Linux gaming through Proton/Wine/DXVK and the various Linux AMD driver efforts it seems like the perfect time to resurrect the Steam Machine hype with a real Valve device to get the ball rolling.
 

inf64

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2011
3,763
4,221
136
I was checking the Zen 4 presentation from HC and noticed this interesting slide that goes against what I posted before (SMT uplift possibly being smaller with a wider and deeper core):


What if Zen 5, being much wider and deeper than Zen 4, gets similarly greater SMT uplift to the tune of ~40%? If the core has an average ST IPC uplift of say ~28% and SMT uplift of ~40%, then it would be roughly 33% more performant in MT workloads / clock versus Zen 4 (what adroc claims):

1.28 x 1.4 / 1.34 = 1.33

So in summary:
~28% ST IPC
~40% SMT uplift
clocks downgrade for desktop version, most likely 5.4-5.5Ghz range for ST and ~4.8Ghz for all core Turbo.
MT throughput around 23% higher, ST around 21% higher

Just speculating here .
 

HurleyBird

Platinum Member
Apr 22, 2003
2,725
1,342
136
What if Zen 5, being much wider and deeper than Zen 4, gets similarly greater SMT uplift to the tune of ~40%? If the core has an average ST IPC uplift of say ~28% and SMT uplift of ~40%, then it would be roughly 33% more performant in MT workloads / clock versus Zen 4 (what adroc claims)

Adroc claims Zen 5 SMT uplift is something like one third of Zen 4's.
 

Saylick

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2012
3,385
7,149
136
I'm sure someone pointed this conjecture out before, but I'll state it in case it wasn't: what's the likelihood that MLID's leaked slide of 10-15% IPC uplift was for MT while ST could be much higher? Such a theory would satisfy both the leaked slide and what Adroc is claiming.
 
Reactions: Tlh97 and Joe NYC

inf64

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2011
3,763
4,221
136
Adroc claims Zen 5 SMT uplift is something like one third of Zen 4's.
Oh I must have missed that post, do you have a link to it? Interesting indeed. AMD's Zen 4 slides seems to suggest that the wider and deeper the core, it should get the bigger SMT uplift.

Edit:
I just did the napkin math and it doesn't really add up. To get 32% higher MT IPC in nT workloads, with ~11% SMT uplift (versus 34% for Zen 4), you would need some insane ST IPC for the Zen 5 core:

1.6 x 1.11 / 1.34 ~= 1.33

60% is never going to happen.
 

itsmydamnation

Platinum Member
Feb 6, 2011
2,863
3,413
136
Oh I must have missed that post, do you have a link to it? Interesting indeed. AMD's Zen 4 slides seems to suggest that the wider and deeper the core, it should get the bigger SMT uplift.

Edit:
I just did the napkin math and it doesn't really add up. To get 32% higher MT IPC in nT workloads, with ~11% SMT uplift (versus 34% for Zen 4), you would need some insane ST IPC for the Zen 5 core:

1.6 x 1.11 / 1.34 ~= 1.33

60% is never going to happen.
But that's not what he said , he said 32%1t not nt
 

Thunder 57

Platinum Member
Aug 19, 2007
2,811
4,094
136
Adroc claims Zen 5 SMT uplift is something like one third of Zen 4's.

I'll be glad when he is proven wrong and just spewing verbal diarrhea. Unless of course he is right and I will have egg on my face. Fun times ahead!

IMHO no one but a VIP has the numbers that he is spitting out. And someone that important isn't going to leak those numbers. Plus claiming a price already? Yeah, not likely.
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
25,740
14,772
136
I'll be glad when he is proven wrong and just spewing verbal diarrhea. Unless of course he is right and I will have egg on my face. Fun times ahead!

IMHO no one but a VIP has the numbers that he is spitting out. And someone that important isn't going to leak those numbers. Plus claiming a price already? Yeah, not likely.
I would not bet anything against his claims. Or for them for that matter. But my gut tells to believe they are closer to the truth than many others.
 

itsmydamnation

Platinum Member
Feb 6, 2011
2,863
3,413
136
@HurleyBird
Yeah but that is not an IPC claim, but throughput per socket claim (which means that clocks can be different once SMT is enabled). Plus, it's about Turin Dense, not vanilla Zen 5 version.
I think the other thing that can't be over looked is fabric bandwidth for dense , it's alot of very wide probably very aggressive prefetching cores for 1 ifop link. So fabric could be a limiting factor which then is addressed in zen6
 

HurleyBird

Platinum Member
Apr 22, 2003
2,725
1,342
136
@HurleyBird
Yeah but that is not an IPC claim, but throughput per socket claim (which means that clocks can be different once SMT is enabled). Plus, it's about Turin Dense, not vanilla Zen 5 version.
Well this is SIR, about as SMT-friendly as it gets really.
Genoa SMT benefit is ~30%-ish there.


Anyway, I suppose it's possible Adroc only knows of Turin-D and there's some other bottleneck there that makes the SMT yield look bad, but if you look at the full context of the whole SMT discussion back then he's clearly claiming that the yield is way down (and Kepler makes similar claims).
 
Last edited:

exquisitechar

Senior member
Apr 18, 2017
666
904
136
I'll be glad when he is proven wrong and just spewing verbal diarrhea. Unless of course he is right and I will have egg on my face. Fun times ahead!

IMHO no one but a VIP has the numbers that he is spitting out. And someone that important isn't going to leak those numbers. Plus claiming a price already? Yeah, not likely.
The price is just his speculation based on the performance he thinks Granite Ridge will have.
 

mpumalanga

Junior Member
Feb 18, 2022
6
14
51

Ryzen 8000 Paper Launch in December?!

Charlys articles regarding AMD have turned into a joke.
He is constantly moaning and ranting about the smallest things.

He seems to be more on a personal vendetta against AMD instead of just reporting or commenting on their products.

His sources in Intel also seem to have vanished. He is only rehashing Intel press releases and emphasizing the positive bits.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |