Poster above said people will wait for the X3d.
Strix just hammers into the bandwidth cap relatively early.Looks like Lunar has a better GPU than Strix at higher power levels and is the same at lower levels.
Yes, but halo won’t fit in a handheld or will it…AMD has a part for iGP-flexing specifically anyway.
wanna bet on GPD trying?but halo won’t fit in a handheld or will it…
Yeah, LNL is a very competent tablet part.I guess Intel has its niche for now.
Is that confirmed based on what you know or a hunch based on what Hassan cryptically said on Xitter?X3D in September.
This legit sounds like an adult site, lolXitter
Well it pretty much is at this point.This legit sounds like an adult site, lol
Shows a couple things, Strix is way better at low power than before, and bandwidth limits it quite early.Looks like Lunar has a better GPU than Strix at higher power levels and is the same at lower levels.
I just wanna modified Zeph for Halo, already the right form factor for it.wanna bet on GPD trying?
if is this is case we need to verify with steel nomad then.Also remember that Time Spy is a strong Intel bench and a weak AMD bench, so what matters is gains relative to previous generations from the same company.
Let’s see but you might be right.Strix should be comfortably ahead in games across all TDP ranges, except for extremely membw bound games or games that just love all flavours of Vega.
You verify it with Video Games.if is this is case we need to verify with steel nomad then.
Exactly
You're right about the technical properties, but @Goop_reformed is also right about the marketing proposition. AMD is selling Zen 5 as the leader in performance, with heavy emphasis on ST.
I was referring to the fact if Time Spy is biased to Intel GPUs then we can use Steel Nomad to see the difference since both are 3D Mark tests and it will tell us if Lunar’s GPU performance is consistent.You verify it with Video Games.
Yeah I know, heresy, but video games are video games.
*ahem*This legit sounds like an adult site, lol
Zen 5 doesn't exist in a vacuum, and SMT is not the selling point of the zen family. It's always been scale and future upgrade path. At the moment, when intel is catching up on the nodes and design, AMD have to find another competitive advantage, and it's single thread performance for Zen 5.Ultimately whether SMT is or isn't a "selling point" for Zen5 is irrelevant. Someone comes in here and asks if Zen5 is gonna be any good, and the answer is "kinda, unless you enjoy the benefits of SMT, then definitely". It really shouldn't matter to anyone here how AMD is actually marketing the thing. What matters is what it does (or will do). That's what got us onto this tangent into the first place, is someone asking whether Zen5 is good.
Zen 5 doesn't exist in a vacuum, and SMT is not the selling point of the zen family.
Some are salvaged dual CCD like mine.More precisely, they have to sell a harvested 1-CCD part if they want to have somewhat profitable products in those price ranges.
So until they add more cores per CCX, 6cores are to stay, sadly.
Basically, these volume parts have to be 1-CCD and they probably don't want to move octocore to R5 segment because then the R7 segment would have to be dual-CCD and that would be bad for profitability.
Well, I would be pleased if I woke up tomorrow and saw I got a PM from Lisa Su, telling me I can have all future ES as long as I stop leaking about themI have a feeling that you may now be Internet famous, but that you wish you weren't. Like you said, you might not be getting any leaks for a long time now if ever. Or they may just be less meaningful.
They're sending a death squad instead.Well, I would be pleased if I woke up tomorrow and saw I got a PM from Lisa Su, telling me I can have all future ES as long as I stop leaking about them
They're sending a death squad instead.
Cheers!
Which is a super-duper heavy compute benchmark, so Intel should probably be ahead innit even more.steel nomad
Well no, Intel GPUs are utter ass at compute.Which is a super-duper heavy compute benchmark, so Intel should probably be ahead innit even more.
does terrible in Steel Nomad as compared to any other non-RT test in 3DMark suite, or basically any modern game (for example, in PS5 ports my OC'd 6900xt is probably 20% faster than 3080ti/3090 and is (substantially) faster in many UE5 titles, and it's like 20% under in Steel Nomad). The only game that compares to this is Cyberpunk, and that's a nVidia tech demo through and through
Completely different with RDNA 3 and Ada. Both are different architectures and RDNA 3 performs well in Steel Nomad. I'm not surprised your 6900xt is faster in games than the 3080ti/3090, RDNA2 was on a better node and it was a good architecture plus Ampere was on a worse 8nm Samsung node. Although, not all games are faster on RDNA2 compared to Ampere, Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora which is an AMD sponsored title is better on Ampere in raster.does terrible in Steel Nomad as compared to any other non-RT test in 3DMark suite, or basically any modern game (for example, in PS5 ports my OC'd 6900xt is probably 20% faster than 3080ti/3090 and is (substantially) faster in many UE5 titles, and it's like 20% under in Steel Nomad). The only game that compares to this is Cyberpunk, and that's a nVidia tech demo through and through