AMD's Zen 5 chips pack in 8.315 billion transistors per compute die, a 28% increase in density
Something it did not do earlier.www.tomshardware.com
28% is incredible.
That's like a full node shrink worth of density gain.
Physical Design magic?
Hard to know if the difference was membw or clocks.What's the ST score at 5.65 and 5.7?
Can't tell you why it's behaving this way. My only thought is maybe it's not boosting higher since it's bound by the slower memory config somehow. The performance difference is certainly a lot larger than a 50MHz clock/effective clock difference.I thought EXPO was for RAM overclocking only? It affects ST boosts?
The ST perf gain of the ES seems to be in line with the average IPC % uplift of Zen 5.Stock/JEDEC: 120
143Pts and my hard-on gone again.
Still no word about that "ladder" cache, huh? I guess we'll just have to wait for either the launch date to get more info, or worst-case Hot Chips in August.The core grew significantly but they were able to shrink the L3 to compensate. How they were able to do so is unknown right now.
Unlikely, because HWInfo has reported CCLK limit of 5650 mhz in cbr24 st.My only thought is maybe it's not boosting higher since it's bound by the slower memory config somehow.
Then the 5900XTNo offense to 5950X owners but that's so ancient now
lol your post have been feeding so many of these sites I hope they are cutting you a cheque or some stock optionsAMD Ryzen 9 9950X outperforms Core i9-14900KS by 12% with unlimited power settings - VideoCardz.com
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X at 160W matches Core i9-14900KS at 253W Comparison from AnandTech leaker. Courtesy of PCGamesN/TechPowerUP There’s another leak featuring a non-official sample of the Ryzen 9 9950X. AMD has partially lifted the embargo on architectural details, but the company has yet to allow...videocardz.com
O M G !!!
The lies! They never end!
View attachment 103405
View attachment 103406
Oh, the unbearable agony of going through all the screenshots! I hope he didn't end up in hospital. Real journalism is so hard these days!
Thats what Im rocking...Then the 5900XT
OMG! I've got a LONG list of benchmarks for you!Thats what Im rocking...
Nah. I'm no.9 which means that whatever I do, I remain poor while everyone else around me gets rich!lol your post have been feeding so many of these sites I hope they are cutting you a cheque or some stock options
Pretty impressive it can hit 11.4 GHz at only 40 W...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X outperforms Core i9-14900KS by 12% with unlimited power settings - VideoCardz.com
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X at 160W matches Core i9-14900KS at 253W Comparison from AnandTech leaker. Courtesy of PCGamesN/TechPowerUP There’s another leak featuring a non-official sample of the Ryzen 9 9950X. AMD has partially lifted the embargo on architectural details, but the company has yet to allow...videocardz.com
O M G !!!
The lies! They never end!
View attachment 103405
View attachment 103406
Oh, the unbearable agony of going through all the screenshots! I hope he didn't end up in hospital. Real journalism is so hard these days!
Does your score change with ram speed?I get 139 ST @ stock clocks on 14900KF. 143 at 5.7GHz sounds really good!
I suppose it does a little? R23 does not sure about r24, my ram was at XMP 2 8000Does your score change with ram speed?
No. I anticipated max OC -30CO ST score not ~StockNot impressed?
While my ST only saw a 120->126 score going from jedec 4800 to fast tuned ram, MT sees a much larger gain. I'll run it real quick for reference.R15 through R23 doesnt scale with RAM speed at all. Its why the 9950X ES leaker ran his R23 at 4800MT/s. Actually helps the score a tiny bit by feeding less power to memory, thus having more to give to CPU.
I think R24 does a little bit, probably no more than 2% - 3%.
i was spot on. Nice work by AMD for an x86 CPU
I mean Apple does up to 144 at 4.06GHz on the M3 series.Not impressed?