Guys you may have it backwards--I believe CPU Monkey used that leak and added to its site, not 100% but they did the same thing after a few other leaks.Good catch, those are just CPU Monkey numbers which are known to be made up, specifically for pre-release hardware. We have actual tests now that show that 1525 is not happening. Even 1400 is out of reach.
View attachment 104061
Sorry that I have to repeat-feature that in this thread, but David Huang already measured bad latencies:would obliterate latency between the CCXs.
Cheaper (50% price drop!) Elite X laptops for us to mess with. Win-Win!Strix clearly makes the X Elite obsolete.
It's not real Zen 5. It was castrated slightly to make space for the NPU.Zen 5 does look underwhelming considering AMD's claims.
I am inclined to agree this is probably what happened. CPU Monkey will aggregate results they find anywhere and everywhere - It seems much less likely an actual OEM system manufacturer would just peel numbers off CPU monkey.Guys you may have it backwards--I believe CPU Monkey used that leak and added to its site, not 100% but they did the same thing after a few other leaks.
That's Marketing Material. With the 3rd Party reviews from today, 1500 should be impossible. We will see. But 1500 would be literally around 5.0GHz on all 12 Cores, which isn't possible. And I don't say the CPU can't go above 40W, I said scaling will be dead above that value, because only 4 of 12 cores can increase their clock. So for every % perfomance, the Cores need to increase the clock by 3 times as much as before.GPD displayed a run that scored 1525, so that s outright possible, beside the 8500G APU wich is 2 + 4, so half the 370, can go above 45W according to Phoronix review
Guys you may have it backwards--I believe CPU Monkey used that leak and added to its site, not 100% but they did the same thing after a few other leaks.
Their geekbench numbers(that they claimed they ran were copied from a asus geekbench result) https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/6915874That s the other way around, CPU Monkey collect numbers here and there that they use for their database, not the first time they did so, they often use numbers that are allegedly leaked even before there s proved tests.
And in case you dont know GPD manufacture devices using AMD APUs,
why would they need to rely on obscure sites since they have ESs long before the consumers have access to actual products..?.
I doubt that FPU will make such a big difference in general Purpose. It's still odd for me that ZEN5 doesn't equal ZEN5 depending on the product.It's not real Zen 5. It was castrated slightly to make space for the NPU.
I think I read that Mike Clark said they worked on four different Zen 5 designs?It's still odd for me that ZEN5 doesn't equal ZEN5 depending on the product.
I think I read that Mike Clark said they worked on four different Zen 5 designs?
That's Marketing Material. With the 3rd Party reviews from today, 1500 should be impossible. We will see. But 1500 would be literally around 5.0GHz on all 12 Cores, which isn't possible. And I don't say the CPU can't go above 40W, I said scaling will be dead above that value, because only 4 of 12 cores can increase their clock. So for every % perfomance, the Cores need to increase the clock by 3 times as much as before.
Nearly 2 GHz fMax difference between Zen5 and Zen5c cores.
Core-to-core latency within the 4 core Zen5 CCX worse than that of the 8 core CCX in Phoenix and Rembrandt.
Meteor Lake latency all the way to the LP-E cores is better than this.
Nearly 2 GHz fMax difference between Zen5 anZen5c cores.
Core-to-core latency within the 4 core Zen5 CCX worse than that of the 8 core CCX in Phoenix and Rembrandt.
Meteor Lake latency all the way to the LP-E cores is better than t
I think so....I think I read that Mike Clark said they worked on four different Zen 5 designs?
should amd have just designed a 12 core ccx
How are they useless?Or just stay with 4+4 or even 6+2 configuration with same CCX. Now they have "12" core cpu where most of cores are pretty useless.
David Huang leaked 3.3GHz clocks for 365 and 3.7GHz for 370 weaks ago. Yesterday @StinkyPinky confirmed the 3.3GHz for 365 with his retail unit, so there is no reason to believe the 3.7GHz for 370 are wrong. I wish they were tho.IIRC AMD said that they extended the frequency range of the C cores,
Yup. Instead they made a modular IF which they can turn parts off to saveshould amd have just designed a 12 core ccx
Something like this. The argument for the Snapdragon was lower prices but so far that hasn't really materialized. At least in the EU the cheapest X Plus models are still around 1100€, with X80-100 Elite models mostly around 1500€, right where the cheapest HX 370 models are starting on launch day. Also, you can get nice Hawk Point models for 700-800 euros. (insert Ape "Where cheaper?" meme)Cheaper (50% price drop!) Elite X laptops for us to mess with. Win-Win!
How are they useless?
Their geekbench numbers(that they claimed they ran were copied from a asus geekbench result) https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/6915874
David Huang leaked 3.3GHz clocks for 365 and 3.7GHz for 370 weaks ago. Yesterday @StinkyPinky confirmed the 3.3GHz for 365 with his retail unit, so there is no reason to believe the 3.7GHz for 370 are wrong. I wish they were tho.