Thread is completely dead. Any chance it might perk up tomorrow? lol
Wonder if reviews will show the official pricing? Thats IF reviews actually are published tomorrow. At this point, who actually knows? Objectively, IMO, the optics of this launch are a bonafide train wreck and I cant believe anyone would disagree with that. The actual products could still save it though. Anybody know the time reviews might publish? 9 or 10AM Eastern US time, possibly?
Oh bro I know, I frequent WCCFTECH, lol. But the graphic legit looks like it was from VideoCardz. Perhaps VideoCardz had an article about the Italian guy that I missed that this was snipped from.That s the numbers from the italian guy, beside this poster is a rabid intel shill and badmouther when it comes to AMD, dont pay attention to this trash spreader.
Videocardz compiled the numbers of the italian guy that got a chip a few weeks ago.Oh bro I know, I frequent WCCFTECH, lol. But the graphic legit looks like it was from VideoCardz. Perhaps VideoCardz had an article about the Italian guy that I missed that this was snipped from.
I rather the thread be dead and calm than repeating discussion from weeks ago:Dont know if this is legit or not, looks like this guy obtained a VCZ gaming slide.
It wasn't a bad faith comparison, it is what the tester had available.Comparing to X3D is bad faith (and misleading without stating that in his claim), its actually impressive that its this close.
Also, for a good share of enthusiasts, Apple silicon is completely irrelevant. If you can't buy the chip, put it on a board and combine it with a high-end graphics card, then it might just as well not exist.Apple has a clear lead in perf/w and that’s on N3B but N3B and N4P isn’t that big of a node difference in efficiency. But that 12 core M3 is really expensive so Apple loses in perf/$.
Pretty sure that was a laptop chart... This is also a Strix thread.Also, for a good share of enthusiasts, Apple silicon is completely irrelevant. If you can't buy the chip, put it on a board and combine it with a high-end graphics card, then it might just as well not exist.
Looks fake. 'Fornite' really? I know videocardz is not the paragon of tech journalism, but I'm sure their writers can spell Fortnite, or at least their proofreaders can.Dont know if this is legit or not, looks like this guy obtained a VCZ gaming slide.
Its from the 9900x vs 7800x3d from the italian guy on yt with buged MT perf gigabyte beta bios and 1:2 timings 7200mt/s so at minimum expect 5% better perf then this fps numbers could be even as high as 10%Looks fake. 'Fornite' really? I know videocardz is not the paragon of tech journalism, but I'm sure their writers can spell Fortnite, or at least their proofreaders can.
I predicted ~10% gaming improvement a while back. Based on leaks we've seen since then, it wouldnt surprise me if it struggles to even hit that now.Hearing from some people gaming performance review tomorrow isn't good
Most especially can't use it with their Windows centric software library.Also, for a good share of enthusiasts, Apple silicon is completely irrelevant. If you can't buy the chip, put it on a board and combine it with a high-end graphics card, then it might just as well not exist.
The reviews are in 2 hrs, the releases are a day behind that IIRCAre they really releasing without independent reviews available. Why are companies so shady nowadays?
I thought they were coming out tomorrow. I still don't know why they are so afraid of independent reviews. Allow consumers 3-4 days to go over several outlets.The reviews are in 2 hrs, the releases are a day behind that IIRC
Because consumers allow them to beAre they really releasing without independent reviews available. Why are companies so shady nowadays?
We are going to get to a point where consumers are going to become reviewers.Because consumers allow them to be
Fine wine... fine wine...First review of 9700x
TLDR: Slower then 7800x3d and 14th gen in gaming. Beta asrock bios. Wierd 4.5ghz all core in cinebench. AIO Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360. temp 61°C in cinebench ppt~88w
After unlocking PBO ppt:150w R23 results +23%. Also some ipc test 4.5ghz vs 4.5ghz. Enjoy.
AMD nie chciało, bym sprawdził Ryzena 7 9700X… i tak to zrobiłem! Czy lepiej kupić poprzednią generację lub poczekać na modele X3D? - 3D-INFO.PL
Sprawdziłem Ryzen 7 9700X? Jak wypada w testach i czy warto go kupić na te pytania znajdziecie odpowiedź w naszej recenzji.3d-info.pl
He wrote there was a new agesa after he finished benching. Also all the tests are done stock 88w ppt. Only cb r23 with 150w ppt with huge 23% gains.Fine wine... fine wine...
*Huffs copium*
Well he did mention, that unlocking PPT gave significantly better results. and not to mention Beta BIOS 🤔🤔🤔Fine wine... fine wine...
*Huffs copium*
So a work-in-progress basically.First review of 9700x
TLDR: Slower then 7800x3d and 14th gen in gaming. Beta asrock bios. Wierd 4.5ghz all core in cinebench. AIO Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360. temp 61°C in cinebench ppt~88w
After unlocking PBO ppt:150w R23 results +23%. Also some ipc test 4.5ghz vs 4.5ghz. Enjoy.
AMD nie chciało, bym sprawdził Ryzena 7 9700X… i tak to zrobiłem! Czy lepiej kupić poprzednią generację lub poczekać na modele X3D? - 3D-INFO.PL
Sprawdziłem Ryzen 7 9700X? Jak wypada w testach i czy warto go kupić na te pytania znajdziecie odpowiedź w naszej recenzji.3d-info.pl