- Mar 3, 2017
- 1,747
- 6,598
- 136
The other thread is not fit to dicuss about Zen 5 perfs in respect of Intel, moreover of AMD s metrics regarding Intel s settings, the point is that AMD comparisons make sense in repect of the competitor s requested settings, that s the debate that is highlighted in my posts, i wont bother about Intel s variable geometry recomendations to reviewers, that s why i posted AMD s methodology slide for the purpose
The above image obscures the performance delta between the 9700X and 7700X. We get a limited picture because it pretty much focuses only on the 9700X, there’s just the two token submissions for the 7700X at the bottom.Maybe there are tangible improvments to be had in the future.
Pretty funny, I have already been running Win11 24H2 for the last two months --> all my ES benches have been on this windows versionGuys, have you seen this? This is some next level smoke and mirrors from AMD regarding Ryzen 9000 gaming testing, lol.
AMD promises Windows 11 patch boosting Zen5, Zen 4, and Zen 3 gaming performance - VideoCardz.com
AMD clarifies discrepancies in gaming performance between official data and reviews The company says that Windows patch will improve gaming performance, explains why ‘admin’ account was used for internal testing. AMD published a blog post discussing the disparity between the official gaming...videocardz.com
no one will give you as much as we can promise youPretty funny, I have already been running Win11 24H2 for the last two months --> all my ES benches have been on this windows version
Maybe thats why i seem to have higher scores than many other Zen5 users 🧐
so their official test numbers came from what version of WIN11 or was it just made up ?AMD states that they have seen some issues with the Branch Predictor not working as intended within Windows 11, but company remain committed to it´s claim about ZEN5 performance improvement
But branch prediction optimizations that will also affect Zen 3 and 4???Fine wine aging so soon?
We 'member:Guys, have you seen this? This is some next level smoke and mirrors from AMD regarding Ryzen 9000 gaming testing, lol.
AMD promises Windows 11 patch boosting Zen5, Zen 4, and Zen 3 gaming performance - VideoCardz.com
AMD clarifies discrepancies in gaming performance between official data and reviews The company says that Windows patch will improve gaming performance, explains why ‘admin’ account was used for internal testing. AMD published a blog post discussing the disparity between the official gaming...videocardz.com
That's actually the interesting part of this whole ordeal and not if CS will suddenly do 500FPS from 450 FPS But we will get another batch of youtube videos that will more or less confirm, depending on game selection, that Zen5 is a failure in gaming because it doesn't beat x3d and costs more. Probably good for content creators but puzzling form AMD marketing point of view as it will only reinforce the public opinion of Zen5 being a failure...But branch prediction optimizations that will also affect Zen 3 and 4???
Why are those two getting these optimizations so late then?
What could be the nature of these optimizations? Is the Windows scheduler going to give some kind of "hints" to the CPU to enable it to predict better?
And re Lol :When taking the geometric mean of 59 benchmarks run across all of the Linux distributions on this AMD Ryzen 9 9950X system, Intel's Clear Linux easily took the crown.
Tapping Intel's Clear Linux netted a 16% improvement on top of the performance offered by Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
Intel's software engineers advancing open-source (x86_64) performance continue doing a splendid job showing what's possible.
Meh. No dual decode clusters. No chonky AVX-512 FPU. No fine wine elation few years from nowThat should lessen the disappointment from a delay in release date for the 9000X3D series.
It is not really 'free' performance - Clear Linux uses some, lets say, not universally beneficial compilation flags that some of the HPC software can't run with, i.e. -ffast-math and some other optimizations because of the FPE and/or inconsistent resultsThank you, Intel!
Most of us here are interested in the ClearLinux Desktop so HPC software not running is moot for us.It is not really 'free' performance - Clear Linux uses some, lets say, not universally beneficial compilation flags that some of the HPC software can't run with, i.e. -ffast-math and some other optimizations because of the FPE and/or inconsistent results
AMD fine wine in action. This time in accelerated timeframe.We 'member:
The AMD FX (Bulldozer) Scheduling Hotfixes Tested
www.anandtech.com
lol WTF is "Custom BIOS*"?? Im guessing if you tested 20 different configurations for Intel you could come up with a similar graph. What a sh!t show!
I am surprised they don't compile their own stuff to order, linking everything statically, then there is really nothing from system that should be able to affect them I can think of. Unless some packages are compiled from source ad hoc using system defaults, but well those can be changedIt is not really 'free' performance - Clear Linux uses some, lets say, not universally beneficial compilation flags that some of the HPC software can't run with, i.e. -ffast-math and some other optimizations because of the FPE and/or inconsistent results
It's a pity AMD itself is unable to communicate this information or provide details about what is going on. I mean if they want to keep their blog accessible to wider audience without burdening it with technical details they could link to another blog post or a white paper about the issue. Otherwise it makes them only look worse...
AMD fine wine in action. This time in accelerated timeframe.
Madeira Edition (TM)AMD fine wine in action. This time in accelerated timeframe.
There was the notion that this launch is a dumpster fire. Is it though? Maybe so, but at least this dumpster seems stocked with astonishing amounts of fuel.Another round of Testing marathon from tech tubers, content for weeks.