Please stop feeding Seronx, he is spouting FD-SOI nonsense since SemiAccurate forums 10+ years ago.
Because like beta max it lost......Anybody care to brief me about what makes FD-SOI nonsense?
Looks very interesting on paper, I fail to see why that would be nonsense. Costs?
that helped a lot, especially since I have no idea what betamax isBecause like beta max it lost......
Sony developed multiple standards of their own. Some clicked. Some didn’tthat helped a lot, especially since I have no idea what betamax is
"Betamax is a consumer-level analog recording and cassette format of magnetic tape for video, commonly known as a video cassette recorder. It was developed by Sony and was released in Japan on
May 10, 1975,"
Yeah no shock I have no idea what that is
Just look at the post history. Same stuff since forever. That and shilling AMD going back to bulldozer.Anybody care to brief me about what makes FD-SOI nonsense?
Looks very interesting on paper, I fail to see why that would be nonsense. Costs?
ok then , like Windows Phone 7, it lost , does that help ?that helped a lot, especially since I have no idea what betamax is
"Betamax is a consumer-level analog recording and cassette format of magnetic tape for video, commonly known as a video cassette recorder. It was developed by Sony and was released in Japan on
May 10, 1975,"
Yeah no shock I have no idea what that is
The last I saw, global foundries was the only one pushing SOI. Neither Intel nor TSMC does it.@Mahboi
All joke posts aside, SOI (Silicon on Insulator) lost out to FinFETs some time ago. It hasn't really been a contest in about a decade. Samsung allegedly has (or had) some FD-SOI tech and GF still produces FD-SOI, but that's about it. It certainly isn't used in anything cutting edge.
I don't know why we're discussing it in a Zen6 thread. AMD will not be using SOI nodes in the future.
4 years ago:The last I saw, global foundries was the only one pushing SOI. Neither Intel nor TSMC does it.
GF was touting that radio modems can be done in SOI(or was it FINFET)? If so maybe mediatek / qualcomm / huaweii can look at it
The link between AMD & SOI is GF. But all of AMD's success has been with TSMCI don't know why we're discussing it in a Zen6 thread. AMD will not be using SOI nodes in the future.
Low-power core options by themselves move to the best PPAC node. Thus, Zen6 Low-power core option in a SoC/APU by themselves without Zen6 Classic/Compact. Would naturally drift to the foundry that has the overall best cost-to-performance/power ratio.I don't know why we're discussing it in a Zen6 thread. AMD will not be using SOI nodes in the future.
That was very confusing.Low-power core options by themselves move to the best PPAC node. Thus, Zen6 Low-power core option in a SoC/APU by themselves without Zen6 Classic/Compact. Would naturally drift to the foundry that has the overall best cost-to-performance/power ratio.
View attachment 107596
Entry (Duron (Spitfire) -> A9-series (Stoney)) = 40% of the market
Mainstream (Llano -> Trinity -> Kaveri -> Bristol -> Dali/Raven2/Pollock -> Mendocino -> Sonoma) = 20% of the market
Premium/Performance (Raven/Renoir/Cezanne/Phoenix/Strix) = 40% of the market
First mention of something Bobcat = November 2006
First mention of Bobcat being cancelled = September 2008
~~ Bobcat went through re-iteration three times ~~
Rather than launching in 2008, the design launched in January 2011.
Clustered Microarchitecture at AMD is even longer:
1997-2004 for first iteration.
2005-2007 for second iteration.
2008-2011 for third iteration.
Then, re-introduction of clustered IP for the clustered FPU Zen3/Zen4/Zen5/Zen6.
As well, re-introduction of clustered IP for the clustered FE Zen5/Zen6.
Zen6LP cores w/o other Zen6/Zen6c cores will naturally only be on 12FDX. Think, instead of 2x4-wide, it is 2x2-wide and 1 ALU/MUL+1 ALU/BR *2 with even smaller FP128 w/ only VEX-encoded instructions. Allowing for high Fmax in a ultra-low-power profile. Since, the low power core is generally always smaller than their high performance counterparts. Alastor 4-wide vs Ascalon 8-wide for example.
View attachment 107604 <-- this effect is more pronounced in FDSOI than in FF/Bulk.
AMD's GF28A was originally 28nm FDSOI Gen2. Bhavani/Beema/Carrizo are GF28A products. Thus were at one time FDSOI at one point.That was very confusing.
Did AMD use FD-SOI ever ?
The PS4 bobcat/jaguar were on TSMC
Analyzing Sony’s PlayStation 4 Pro Hardware Reveal: What Lies Beneath
www.anandtech.com
If they hadn't been doing it for a decade I'd assume it was the result of an LLM hallucinating.I'm not taking it seriously, but reading it like a fan fiction of some rambling crank is very funny. (I mean, it is exactly that)
Between 16nm and 7nm is the 12FDX Versal set for 2026. Simplifying and producing a cost-optimized solution replacing R2314+VE2302 with a single package solution. The main core on the x86-64 side is the Zen6LP core.Give it up Seronx, they're not using FD-SOI
I'm not taking it seriously, but it's funny to accept and read it as a fanfiction of some rambling old dude. (I mean, it is exactly that)