- Mar 10, 2006
- 11,715
- 2,012
- 126
And here you are lying because i stated that the perf/Watt improvement was about 13.5% but that the transistors performance was hugely degraded and compensated by the layout and input capacitances at the rate of 0.6 as published by Intel, 0.60/0.835 = 0.71, that s the loss in conductance of the transistors from 22nm to 14nm..
So you are saying that 14nm transistor performance regressed from 22nm but that BDW was 13.5% more efficient thanks to architectural/design enhancements?
Next time keep your facts straight as you are caught in blatantly deffamatory claims wich are obvious lies, check my post history about the numbers above if you want, you would be hard pressed to sustain your dishonnests statements, a practice that indeed do not surprise me at all coming from you...
If I am wrong, then I apologize, but it seems as though you are claiming that 14nm transistor performance regressed from 22nm.