imported_tajmahal
Lifer
- Jul 9, 2009
- 10,722
- 2,064
- 136
Title says it all.
I wanna go on a cruise to somewhere warm coming spring. Wife isn't having it and doesn't want to go anywhere south of USA due to Zika virus.
1. Do you think that's unreasonable? I know media always over exaggerate things, but it only takes 1 virus to destroy our life. I think her assessment is pretty common. Any flights to central & south America have dropped like a brick. A single friend of mine will be taking advantage of this by flying everywhere there.
2. Where else can we go that's warm & tropical? Anywhere outside of Caribbean would be very very expensive from US.
Headed down to the Dominican Republic for a couple of months....am i going to die from Zika?
I second the suggestion for Hawaii. You can do a Hawaiian cruise too and leave from San Diego or Mexico and island hop....or just fly to one of the islands and stay for a week. I like Kauai for how quiet it is...and I like Oahu (Waikiki) for the restaurants.
You could risk it because on the ship, you're safe from mosquitoes when you're off the coast. When travelling off the ship, you can always cover up and wear deet on exposed skin...don't be outside at dusk or in the evenings and you'll be somewhat limited.
The only problem is, when you consider the cost if she does get bit, it's just not worth it when you can hit the other ocean and limit the risk to virtually nothing....
For some reason, Hawaiian music fills me with undying rage.
I saw a talk in which Zika virus in mice seems to affect the internal architecture of the testes, reducing testosterone production, fertility, and testicular volume. D:
Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
It was work by Michael diamond from WashU. I think the stuff he showed was published very recently. The good news is that there seems to be pretty effective neutralizing antibodies, although who knows how easily Zika can escape itInteresting. I saw a post on Anandtech yesterday that mentioned this study:
But seriously, scary shit. I work in a lab that studies sperm competition and, needless to say, we spend most of our time dealing with sperm development, testis epididymis, etc, and we started discussing this data after I saw Ironwing's post.
I wonder--did you catch the dosage they were injecting into mice and if they looked at multiple ages of individuals?
The way that this seems to be effecting non-regenerative tissue is, well, not good. A real Bummer, as someone might say.