and other stuff that have no basis in reality.
Technically the FEDs could still go after him with Federal civil rights violations. The chances of that happening are close to zero percent but not absolutely zero. I would be shocked if they did but it is within the realm of possibility.
On the call with the 911 operator we can hear Zimmerman use the N word, so we know he attacked trayvon out of hate.
The FACT that GZ targeted, stalked, and confronted young Trayvon because he was black is NOT in dispute.
Lies. He never used the N Word.
There are ZERO facts stating this.
According to the audio, Martin circled Zimmerman's car and then ran off behind some homes. Zimmerman follows but doesn't know where Martin is located. At this point Martin could have just gone home since he did lose Zimmerman and was close to his house.....but he didn't.
Martin did not have THC in his blood?
Martin had not been kicked out of school?
Martin did not call Zimmerman the N word, while on the phone to a friend?
.
Show me the convictions for those. Oh wait, you can't.
And you made crap up about double jeopardy. You have shown that you are completely ignorant on this issue.
And racial profiling involving the stalking of a child by a wannabe thug neighborhood watch wannabe cop should be addressed with legal remedies in the future. For example, such people should not be allowed to ever touch a gun.
I must have missed this, where did this info come from?
So what? Is it a crime for someone to profile by race?
Lets say Zimmerman did racially profile Martin. Did that give martin the right to attack Zimmerman?
I disagree.
The general public would see it as an act of desperation on part of the government.
Lol, someone (I don't remember who) said race was not involved I showed you that it was involved and you just agreed that race was involved by admitting that he was racially profiled.
Whether or not that is legal has nothing to do with my statement or the facts. Nice job with the goal posts though.
What happened to you that you are so hurt today? What made you so miserable? You're on this one-man crusade to, well, I'm not even exactly sure what you're doing other than venting your frustrations out on others.
I do hope you find some peace in your life, you need it sorely.
Martin was beating up Zimmerman when Zimmerman shot Martin. You make up all the fine details you want, it will never chance the core situation.
That's just a flat out lie.
True. How is a 17 year old a child? Also there was evidence showing Zimmerman isn't a racist yet it's ignored.
True. How is a 17 year old a child? Also there was evidence showing Zimmerman isn't a racist yet it's ignored.
I must have missed this, where did this info come from?
Zimmerman is a racist. We already know that he was racially profiling a child, too.
Zimmerman is a racist. We already know that he was racially profiling a child, too.
And you're the last person to talk about evidence. You always fail to produce any.
Zimmerman is a racist. We already know that he was racially profiling a child, too.
And you're the last person to talk about evidence. You always fail to produce any.
The evidence clearly disputes this though. Why did George Zimmerman go against the white cop who abused the black man? That doesn't sound like a racist.
http://www.inquisitr.com/847663/george-zimmerman-racism-he-helped-black-people/
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthe...-me-i-incorrectly-thought-george-zimmerman-wa
http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/12/justice/florida-teen-shooting
Sounds like a Ron Paul type argument. Sorry, but just because he has a few issues in the past that may sound fine, it doesn't absolve him of his racist history.
So disappointed in the media. Double standard still moving forward where speculation is a no no regarding GZ in a positive light, but its game on with endless speculation of TMs positive desires that night and omittance of any facts that indicates any concerns about TMs character and intent for GZ
During the trial Justice was called for, but we know that was simple code for Guilty and not justice.
Protip: al Sharpton is the dead giveaway on what's wrong with the discussion.
Read the 911 transcript or listen to the audio.
http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/326700-full-transcript-zimmerman.html
Here's an interactive map as well (1st video in step 1)
http://www.hlntv.com/interactive/2013/06/17/zimmerman-trayvon-map-interactive
The map doesn't show at the end that Zimmerman replied "Ok" to the dispatcher's instructions of not following Martin. This is a common misconception by the public that Zimmerman followed anyway and didn't listen to the dispatcher. The map is still pretty good in visualizing what happened but it left out that key piece at the end.
With the audio and no proof that goes against Zimmerman's story of what happened, I think the jury made the right decision.
I recommend everyone does their own research instead of jumping to conclusions based on their emotions.
There's zero evidence that shows this. The dispatcher asked Zimmerman "Is he white, black, or Hispanic?". Zimmerman replies "He looks black".
That's it!
Show me the convictions for those. Oh wait, you can't.
And you made crap up about double jeopardy. You have shown that you are completely ignorant on this issue.
And racial profiling involving the stalking of a child by a wannabe thug neighborhood watch wannabe cop should be addressed with legal remedies in the future. For example, such people should not be allowed to ever touch a gun.